National Catholic Register
I ett 11 -sidor långt vittnesmål som NCR publicerar pekar ärkebiskop Carlo Maria Vigano -Vatikanens fd nuncie i USA -ut påve Franciskus mfl som delaktiga i att mörka Mc Carricks sexuella övergrepp och att Franciskus känt till men valt att upphäva Benediktus sanktioner mot kardinal Mc Carrick. Vigano kräver Franciskus mfl avgång.
Några citat från NCR
”In 2011, on arrival in Washington D.C., Archbishop Viganò said he personally repeated the sanction to McCarrick. “The cardinal, muttering in a barely comprehensible way, admitted that he had perhaps made the mistake of sleeping in the same bed with some seminarians at his beach house, but he said this as if it had no importance,” Viganò recalled in his testimony. ”
”The second half of Viganò’s testimony primarily deals with what Pope Francis knew about McCarrick, and how he acted.
He recalled meeting Cardinal McCarrick in June 2013 at the Pope’s Domus Sanctae Marthae residence, during which McCarrick told him “in a tone somewhere between ambiguous and triumphant: ‘The Pope received me yesterday; tomorrow I am going to China’” — the implication being that Francis had lifted the travel ban placed on him by Benedict. (Further evidence of this can be seen in this interview McCarrick gave the National Catholic Reporter in 2014.)
At a private meeting a few days later, Archbishop Viganò said the Pope asked him “‘What is Cardinal McCarrick like?’” to which the archbishop replied: “He corrupted generations of seminarians and priests and Pope Benedict ordered him to withdraw to a life of prayer and penance.” The former nuncio said he believes the Pope’s purpose in asking him was to “find out if I was an ally of McCarrick or not.” ”
Ur Viganos vittnesmål
”Francis is abdicating the mandate which Christ gave to Peter to confirm the brethren. Indeed, by his action he has divided them, led them into error, and encouraged the wolves to continue to tear apart the sheep of Christ’s flock.
In this extremely dramatic moment for the universal Church, he must acknowledge his mistakes and, in keeping with the proclaimed principle of zero tolerance, Pope Francis must be the first to set a good example for cardinals and bishops who covered up McCarrick’s abuses and resign along with all of them.
Even in dismay and sadness over the enormity of what is happening,let us not lose hope!
We well know that the great majority of our pastors live their priestly vocation with fidelity and dedication.
It is in moments of great trial that the Lord’s grace is revealed in abundance and makes His limitless mercy available to all; but it is granted only to those who are truly repentant and sincerely propose to amend their lives. This is a favorable time for the Church to confess her sins, to convert, and to do penance.”
https://www.scribd.com/document/387040553/TESTIMONY-of-His-Excellency-Carlo-Maria-Vigano-Titular-Archbishop-of-Ulpiana-Apostolic-Nuncio#from_embed
// Irène
PS Lettergate våren 2018
Pope Francis has accepted Mgr Dario Viganò’s resignation following a row over the redacted letter from Pope Emeritus
https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/8763/vigan-resigns-as-prefect-of-communication-secretariat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=af7PWi_ar34
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-letter/vatican-lettergate-scandal-comes-to-a-head-as-text-released-idUSKCN1GU005
https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/marie-collins-irish-survivors-francis-said-hes-not-considering-new
Vad jag kan förstå så är inte ärkebiskop Carlo Maria Viganó, född 1941, och den fd chefen Vatikanens mediecentrum Dario Edoardo Viganò(lettergate), född 1962, samma person.
Yvonne Jansson
Olika bedömningar ang Vatikanens fd kommunikationschefs roll i Lettergate (Som synes på bilderna ej samma person som fd nuntien)
”Some admirers of Francis appear inclined to style Viganò’s resignation as a basically noble act, a case of falling on his sword for having attempted to protect Pope Benedict from appearing petty for refusing to comment on the series because of his objection to a contribution by an old theological rival.
Critics, on the other hand, not only see the affair as the latest confirmation of the general ineptitude of Francis’s team, but as an act of disrespect to the emeritus pope, essentially a case of trying to “censor” or “muzzle” what Benedict really thinks.”
https://cruxnow.com/news-analysis/2018/03/22/lettergate-debacle-unnecessary-but-useful-in-surfacing-tensions/
// Irène