Om pliktcelibatet

National Catholic Reporter

Mandatory celibacy at the heart of what’s wrong

“The magnet is dead. Celibacy cuts to the heart of what is wrong in the church today. Despite denials from Rome, there will be no halting, much less recovering from, the mass destruction caused by the priest sex abuse scandal without reforms centered on the abandonment of celibacy as a near-universal prerequisite for ordination to the Latin-rite priesthood.No, celibacy does not “cause” the sex abuse of minors, and yes, abusers of children come from many walks of life. Indeed, most abuse occurs within families or circles of close acquaintance. But the ongoing Catholic scandal has laid bare an essential pathology that is unique to the culture of clericalism, and mandatory celibacy is essential to it. A special problem arises when, on the one hand, homosexuality is demonized as a matter of doctrine, while, on the other, the banishment of women leaves the priest living in a homophilic world. In some men, both straight and gay, the stresses of such contradictions lead to irrepressible urges that can be indulged only by exploitation of the vulnerable and available, objects of desire who in many cases are boys, whether prepubescent or adolescent. Now we know.”

“Not sex, but power was the issue. The imposition of sexual abstinence was a mode of control over the interior lives of clergy, since submission in radical abstinence required an extraordinary abandonment of the will. In theory, the abandonment was to God; in practice, it was to the “superior.” The stakes were infinite, since sexual desire marked the threshold of hell. The normally human was, for priests, the occasion of bad faith.”

“The celibacy encyclical, maintaining the weight of “sacrifice” on clergy, prepared the way for the laity-crushing Humanae Vitae in 1968, with its re-condemnation of birth control. In response to the pope’s initial removal of birth control from the “competence” of the council, one of its leading figures, Cardinal Leon-Joseph Suenens of Belgium, rose immediately with a warning; “I beg you, my brother bishops, let us avoid a new ‘Galileo affair.’ One is enough for the church.”

“Lies, denial, arrogance, selfishness and cowardice — such are the notes of the structure within which Catholic priests now live, however individually virtuous many of them nevertheless remain. Celibacy is that structure’s central pillar and must be removed. The Catholic people see this clearly. It is time for us to say so.”

// Irène

PS  Huvet på spiken om kyrkans fördömande av artificiella preventivmedel som  kyrkans ”andra Galieo affär.”

Det här inlägget postades i Uncategorized. Bokmärk permalänken.

2 svar på Om pliktcelibatet

  1. Gert Gelotte skriver:

    Irène,

    jag fastnar för följande:
    “Not sex, but power was the issue. The imposition of sexual abstinence was a mode of control over the interior lives of clergy, since submission in radical abstinence required an extraordinary abandonment of the will. In theory, the abandonment was to God; in practice, it was to the “superior.”

    Sammantaget bland det skarpaste jag läst i NCR. Det blåser upp till storm.

    Gert Gelotte

  2. Anneli Magnusson skriver:

    “Lies, denial, arrogance, selfishness and cowardice — such are the notes of the structure within which Catholic priests now live, however individually virtuous many of them nevertheless remain.”
    Det är en hård verklighet som skildras i ovanstående citat. Kan det vara resultatet av att Katolska kyrkans ledare i århundraden levt och verkat i en enkönat manlig miljö?
    Är det då makten och inte kärleken som varit centrum är det inte förvånande med de sexuella övergreppen som prästerna gjort sig skyldiga till och det råa övervåld som ofta använts.
    Vad jag förstått från väl insatta personer är det heller inte så att allt kommit fram ännu.
    /Anneli

Lämna ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *